the fundamental problem of the film is: who are you?
is not a film about racism, immigration is not a movie, not a film about life in prison.
is an epic human. from nothing to being someone . and to be someone are power and money. as well as a bit 'deaths.
I seem to see a line between what was hatred of Kassovitz, which then crosses the death instinct of Jean-François Richet with Vincent Cassel to get this the prophet of audriard, which is perhaps the most beautiful of the three, because it gathers them all together.
is like a human epic Barry Lyndon, which only tells you the rise, which is simultaneously the downhill, and that is also the symbol of the rise of a new human being, and the descent into underworld of human beings. Big words bother type identity. that identity is modern man? to convict, that resulting from race, religion, ethnic and geographical roots, from money and power? or maybe none of these things?
by nothing to someone , living in prison. without fundamentalism, and only with a law, that of self-interest achieved through education to violence out of control initially, but then clearly channeled towards a well defined strategy to achieve power.
is beautiful, this film. is engaging, almost "gender", but at the same time copyright (like the other two I mentioned), as happens sometimes with French films.
and one asks, but because we have these films you can not do?
is not a film about racism, immigration is not a movie, not a film about life in prison.
is an epic human. from nothing to being someone . and to be someone are power and money. as well as a bit 'deaths.
I seem to see a line between what was hatred of Kassovitz, which then crosses the death instinct of Jean-François Richet with Vincent Cassel to get this the prophet of audriard, which is perhaps the most beautiful of the three, because it gathers them all together.
is like a human epic Barry Lyndon, which only tells you the rise, which is simultaneously the downhill, and that is also the symbol of the rise of a new human being, and the descent into underworld of human beings. Big words bother type identity. that identity is modern man? to convict, that resulting from race, religion, ethnic and geographical roots, from money and power? or maybe none of these things?
by nothing to someone , living in prison. without fundamentalism, and only with a law, that of self-interest achieved through education to violence out of control initially, but then clearly channeled towards a well defined strategy to achieve power.
is beautiful, this film. is engaging, almost "gender", but at the same time copyright (like the other two I mentioned), as happens sometimes with French films.
and one asks, but because we have these films you can not do?
0 comments:
Post a Comment